ScienceLogic

ScienceLogic SL1 (formerly EM7) is affected by an unspecified vulnerability involving an unspecified third-party component packaged with SL1.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the download and convert report feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the dashboard scheduler feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the ticket report generate feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the “dash export” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command.

A command injection vulnerability exists in the ARP ping device tool feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user controlled input and passes it directly to a shell command.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “logging export” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “message viewer iframe” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “message viewer print” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “network print report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “notes view” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporter events type” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporter events type date” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket event report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket queue watchers” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket template watchers” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket watchers email” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “topology data service” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the vendor_country parameter of the “vendor print report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the vendor_state parameter of the “vendor print report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “admin dynamic app mib errors” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “reporting job editor” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “schedule editor decoupled” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “schedule editor” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.

A SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “json walker” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query.