Read the docs
TI-2021-12415 Aliases CVE-2021-32747

Custom variable protection and blacklists can be circumvented

Priority LOW 32CWE-200Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Information disclosure
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · None · None
Fix status
No fix listed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-200.

Summary

Icinga Web 2 is an open source monitoring web interface, framework, and command-line interface. A vulnerability in which custom variables are exposed to unauthorized users exists between versions 2.0.0 and 2.8.2. Custom variables are user-defined keys and values on configuration objects in Icinga 2. These are commonly used to reference secrets in other configurations such as check commands to be able to authenticate with a service being checked. Icinga Web 2 displays these custom variables to logged in users with access to said hosts or services. In order to protect the secrets from being visible to anyone, it's possible to setup protection rules and blacklists in a user's role. Protection rules result in `***` being shown instead of the original value, the key will remain. Backlists will hide a custom variable entirely from the user. Besides using the UI, custom variables can also be accessed differently by using an undocumented URL parameter. By adding a parameter to the affected routes, Icinga Web 2 will show these columns additionally in the respective list. This parameter is also respected when exporting to JSON or CSV. Protection rules and blacklists however have no effect in this case. Custom variables are shown as-is in the result. The issue has been fixed in the 2.9.0, 2.8.3, and 2.7.5 releases. As a workaround, one may set up a restriction to hide hosts and services with the custom variable in question.

Why it matters now

EPSS 0.01381 72nd percentileScored 2026-11-07
Public exploit Yes 1 exploit referenceTagged by NVD
Fix No fix listed No fixed version in the sources yet

SSVC decision points

Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
Icingaicingaweb22.0.0 – 2.8.2—No fix listedCNA
  • icingaweb2 VendorIcinga Affected 2.0.0 – 2.8.2 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:icinga:icinga:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*2.0.0 to before 2.7.5; 2.8.0 to before 2.8.3VulnerableIcinga
  • cpe:2.3:a:icinga:icinga:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 2.0.0 to before 2.7.5; 2.8.0 to before 2.8.3 Vulnerable ·Icinga

Remediation

No fixed version listed by the sources yet.

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2021-32747

References

  • TI-2024-16337 Icinga Director configuration is susceptible to Cross-Site Request Forgery CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.3
  • TI-2012-05060 Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in the get_history function in history.cgi in… CVSS 2.0HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2013-05840 Multiple off-by-one errors in Nagios Core 3.5.1, 4.0.2, and earlier, and Icinga before… CVSS 2.0MEDIUM 5.5
  • TI-2024-32957 Icinga 2 has a TLS Certificate Validation Bypass for JSON-RPC and HTTP API Connections CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-30428 Icinga 2 certificate renewal might incorrectly renew an invalid certificate CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
  • TI-2021-12411 Passwords used to access external services inadvertently exposed through API CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.8
See all 30 →

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences