Read the docs
TI-2021-19461 Aliases CVE-2021-43572GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3

The verify function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (aka starkbank-escada or…

Priority MEDIUM 45CWE-347Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · High · High
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-347.

Summary

The verify function in the Stark Bank Python ECDSA library (aka starkbank-escada or ecdsa-python) before 2.0.1 fails to check that the signature is non-zero, which allows attackers to forge signatures on arbitrary messages.

Why it matters now

EPSS 0.01248 69th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Public exploit Yes 1 exploit referenceTagged by NVD
Fix Fixed starkbank-ecdsa (PyPI): 2.0.1

SSVC decision points

Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
——all versions—No fix listedCNA
—starkbank-ecdsa (PyPI)before 2.0.12.0.1Patch availableGHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3
  • — Vendor— Affected all versions Fixed in — No fix listed CNA
  • starkbank-ecdsa (PyPI) Vendor— Affected before 2.0.1 Fixed in 2.0.1 Patch available GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:starkbank:ecdsa-python:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*before 2.0.1VulnerableStarkbank
  • cpe:2.3:a:starkbank:ecdsa-python:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions before 2.0.1 Vulnerable ·Starkbank

Remediation

  • Fix · GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3 starkbank-ecdsa (PyPI) Fixed in 2.0.1 Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2021-43572
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-92vm-mxjf-jqf3

References

Sources