Uncontrolled resource consumption in Undertow
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Impact type
- Denial of service
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- None · None · High
- Fix status
- Partial Red Hat: 7 fixed, 6 without a fix
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA, GitHub and Red Hat. Impact type from CWE-400.
Summary
When a POST request comes through AJP and the request exceeds the max-post-size limit (maxEntitySize), Undertow's AjpServerRequestConduit implementation closes a connection without sending any response to the client/proxy. This behavior results in that a front-end proxy marking the backend worker (application server) as an error state and not forward requests to the worker for a while. In mod_cluster, this continues until the next STATUS request (10 seconds intervals) from the application server updates the server state. So, in the worst case, it can result in "All workers are in error state" and mod_cluster responds "503 Service Unavailable" for a while (up to 10 seconds). In mod_proxy_balancer, it does not forward requests to the worker until the "retry" timeout passes. However, luckily, mod_proxy_balancer has "forcerecovery" setting (On by default; this parameter can force the immediate recovery of all workers without considering the retry parameter of the workers if all workers of a balancer are in error state.). So, unlike mod_cluster, mod_proxy_balancer does not result in responding "503 Service Unavailable". An attacker could use this behavior to send a malicious request and trigger server errors, resulting in DoS (denial of service). This flaw was fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | Undertow | Fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2 | — | No fix listed | CNA |
| — | io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) | before 2.2.19.Final | 2.2.19.Final | Patch available | GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5 |
| — | io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) | 2.3.0.Alpha1 to before 2.3.0.Alpha2 | 2.3.0.Alpha2 | Patch available | GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5 |
- Undertow Vendor— Affected Fixed in Undertow 2.2.19.Final, Undertow 2.3.0.Alpha2 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA
- io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) Vendor— Affected before 2.2.19.Final Fixed in 2.2.19.Final Patch available GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5
- io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) Vendor— Affected 2.3.0.Alpha1 to before 2.3.0.Alpha2 Fixed in 2.3.0.Alpha2 Patch available GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5
CPE configurations NVD · 4
| CPE | Versions | Role | Vendor |
|---|---|---|---|
| cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | not specified by NVD | Vulnerable | Red Hat |
| cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | 7.0.0 | Vulnerable | Red Hat |
| cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | before 2.2.19 | Vulnerable | Red Hat |
| cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.3.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:* | 2.3.0 alpha1 | Vulnerable | Red Hat |
- cpe:2.3:a:redhat:integration_camel_k:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions not specified by NVD Vulnerable ·Red Hat
- cpe:2.3:a:redhat:jboss_fuse:7.0.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 7.0.0 Vulnerable ·Red Hat
- cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions before 2.2.19 Vulnerable ·Red Hat
- cpe:2.3:a:redhat:undertow:2.3.0:alpha1:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 2.3.0 alpha1 Vulnerable ·Red Hat
Remediation
- Fix · GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5 io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) Fixed in 2.2.19.Final Advisory →
- Fix · GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5 io.undertow:undertow-core (Maven) Fixed in 2.3.0.Alpha2 Advisory →
Red Hat 7 advisories
- RHSA-2025:9583 Released 2025-06-25 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3.14 Security update
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 Server eap7-jackson-annotations-2.10.4-3.redhat_00006.1.el7eap, eap7-jackson-core-2.10.4-3.redhat_00006.1.el7eap, eap7-jackson-databind-2.10.4-5.redhat_00006.1.el7eap +40
- RHSA-2025:4226 Released 2025-04-28 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1.10 on RHEL 7 security update
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 Server eap7-activemq-artemis-1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7, eap7-activemq-artemis-cli-1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7, eap7-activemq-artemis-commons-1.5.5.016-1.redhat_00001.1.ep7.el7 +22
- RHSA-2022:8652 Released 2022-11-28 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat Fuse 7.11.1 release and security update
- Red Hat Fuse 7.11.1
Show 4 more Red Hat advisories
- RHSA-2022:6822 Released 2022-10-05 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.7 Security update
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 8 eap7-snakeyaml-1.31.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el8eap, eap7-undertow-2.2.19-1.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el8eap
- RHSA-2022:6825 Released 2022-10-05 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.7 Security update
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform io.undertow.undertow-core-2.2.19.SP2-redhat-00001.jar, org.yaml.snakeyaml-1.31.0.redhat-00001.jar
- RHSA-2022:6821 Released 2022-10-05 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.7 Security update
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 7 Server eap7-snakeyaml-1.31.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el7eap, eap7-undertow-2.2.19-1.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el7eap
- RHSA-2022:6823 Released 2022-10-05 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.4.7 Security update
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 9 eap7-snakeyaml-1.31.0-1.redhat_00001.1.el9eap, eap7-undertow-2.2.19-1.SP2_redhat_00001.1.el9eap
Vendor assessments
Red Hat
Red Hat rating: Moderate. Red Hat's page for this CVE →
| Product | Status | Plan or fix |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Data Grid 8 | Affected | No fix planned: Will not fix |
| Red Hat Integration Camel K 1 | Affected | No fix yet |
| Red Hat Integration Camel Quarkus 1 | Affected | No fix yet: Fix deferred |
| Red Hat JBoss Data Grid 7 | Affected | No fix planned: Out of support scope |
| Red Hat JBoss Fuse 6 | Affected | No fix planned: Out of support scope |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 13 (Queens) | Affected | No fix planned: Out of support scope |
| Red Hat Fuse 7.11.1 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:8652 |
| Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 7 Server | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6821 |
| Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 8 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6822 |
| Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 9 | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6823 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform | Fixed | RHSA-2022:6825 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.1 EUS for RHEL 7 Server | Fixed | RHSA-2025:4226 |
| Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 7.3 EUS for RHEL 7 Server | Fixed | RHSA-2025:9583 |
Not affected: 10 products
- Red Hat Decision Manager 7
- Red Hat Integration Service Registry
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 7 Server
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 8
- Red Hat JBoss EAP 7.4 for RHEL 9
- Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
- Red Hat Process Automation 7
- Red Hat Single Sign-On 7
- Red Hat build of Quarkus
- Red Hat support for Spring Boot
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2022-2053
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5
References
More Red Hat Integration Camel K vulnerabilities
- TI-2023-23979 The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because… KEVCVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2021-02983 Deserialization of untrusted data in JMSAppender in Apache Log4j 1.2 CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2022-03885 Codehaus-plexus: directory traversal CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2023-04469 Quarkus: http security policy bypass CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.1
- TI-2022-04106 Server-side request forgery in undertow CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2024-07308 Undertow: improper state management in proxy protocol parsing causes information leakage CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
Sources
- CVE-2022-2053 · CVE Program
- CVE-2022-2053 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-95rf-557x-44g5 · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
- CVE-2022-2053 · Red Hat security data · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences