Read the docs
TI-2023-05634 Aliases CVE-2023-6129GHSA-rj8q-prqp-jwfg

POLY1305 MAC implementation corrupts vector registers on PowerPC

Priority LOW 33CWE-440Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · Low · High
Fix status
Partial Red Hat: 3 fixed, 6 without a fix

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CISA ADP. Fix status from CNA and Red Hat.

Summary

Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications running on PowerPC CPU based platforms if the CPU provides vector instructions. Impact summary: If an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL for PowerPC CPUs restores the contents of vector registers in a different order than they are saved. Thus the contents of some of these vector registers are corrupted when returning to the caller. The vulnerable code is used only on newer PowerPC processors supporting the PowerISA 2.07 instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However unless the compiler uses the vector registers for storing pointers, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3. If this cipher is enabled on the server a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used. This implies that TLS server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.02323 83rd percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Partial OpenSSL (OpenSSL): 3.2.1, 3.1.5, 3.0.13Red Hat: 2 advisoriesRed Hat: 3 fixed, 6 without a fix

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
OpenSSLOpenSSL3.2.0 to before 3.2.1; 3.1.0 to before 3.1.5; 3.0.0 to before 3.0.133.2.1, 3.1.5, 3.0.13Patch availableCNA
  • OpenSSL VendorOpenSSL Affected 3.2.0 to before 3.2.1; 3.1.0 to before 3.1.5; 3.0.0 to before 3.0.13 Fixed in 3.2.1, 3.1.5, 3.0.13 Patch available CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 2

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*3.0.0 – 3.0.12; 3.1.0 – 3.1.4VulnerableOpenSSL
cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*3.2.0VulnerableOpenSSL
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 3.0.0 – 3.0.12; 3.1.0 – 3.1.4 Vulnerable ·OpenSSL
  • cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:3.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 3.2.0 Vulnerable ·OpenSSL

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA OpenSSL (OpenSSL) Fixed in 3.2.1, 3.1.5, 3.0.13

Red Hat 2 advisories

  • RHSA-2024:9088 Released 2024-11-12 · Red Hat rating Moderate
    edk2 security update
    • Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder (v. 9) edk2-aarch64-20240524-6.el9_5, edk2-ovmf-20240524-6.el9_5, edk2-tools-20240524-6.el9_5 +1
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9) edk2-20240524-6.el9_5, edk2-aarch64-20240524-6.el9_5, edk2-ovmf-20240524-6.el9_5
  • RHSA-2024:2447 Released 2024-04-30 · Red Hat rating Low
    openssl and openssl-fips-provider security update
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9) openssl-devel-1:3.0.7-27.el9, openssl-perl-1:3.0.7-27.el9
    • Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 9) openssl-1:3.0.7-27.el9, openssl-libs-1:3.0.7-27.el9

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Low. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

ProductStatusPlan or fix
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6AffectedNo fix planned: Out of support scope
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7AffectedNo fix planned: Out of support scope
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred
Red Hat Software CollectionsAffectedNo fix planned: Out of support scope
Red Hat CodeReady Linux Builder (v. 9)Fixed RHSA-2024:9088
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AppStream (v. 9)Fixed RHSA-2024:2447, RHSA-2024:9088
Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 9)Fixed RHSA-2024:2447
Not affected: 9 products
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
  • Red Hat Enterprise Linux BaseOS (v. 9)
  • Red Hat JBoss Core Services
  • Red Hat JBoss Web Server 5
  • Red Hat Software Collections

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2023-6129
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-rj8q-prqp-jwfg

References

  • TI-2022-01915 The c_rehash script allows command injection CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2021-02645 SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2009-03392 The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft… CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2022-01176 The c_rehash script allows command injection CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2014-00154 The (1) TLS and (2) DTLS implementations in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1g do not properly… KEVCVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2025-14107 Stack buffer overflow in CMS (Auth)EnvelopedData parsing CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.8
See all 312 →

Sources