SvelteKit has Insufficient Cross-Site Request Forgery Protection
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Impact type
- Tampering
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · High
- Fix status
- Fixed
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-352.
Summary
SvelteKit is a web development framework. The SvelteKit framework offers developers an option to create simple REST APIs. This is done by defining a `+server.js` file, containing endpoint handlers for different HTTP methods. SvelteKit provides out-of-the-box cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection to its users. While the implementation does a sufficient job in mitigating common CSRF attacks, prior to version 1.15.1, the protection can be bypassed by simply specifying a different `Content-Type` header value. If abused, this issue will allow malicious requests to be submitted from third-party domains, which can allow execution of operations within the context of the victim's session, and in extreme scenarios can lead to unauthorized access to users’ accounts. SvelteKit 1.15.1 updates the `is_form_content_type` function call in the CSRF protection logic to include `text/plain`. As additional hardening of the CSRF protection mechanism against potential method overrides, SvelteKit 1.15.1 is now performing validation on `PUT`, `PATCH` and `DELETE` methods as well. This latter hardening is only needed to protect users who have put in some sort of `?_method= override` feature themselves in their `handle` hook, so that the request that resolve sees could be `PUT`/`PATCH`/`DELETE` when the browser issues a `POST` request.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- Poc
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| sveltejs | kit | before 1.15.1 | 1.15.1 | Patch available | CNA |
| — | @sveltejs/kit (npm) | before 1.15.1 | 1.15.1 | Patch available | GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2 |
- kit Vendorsveltejs Affected before 1.15.1 Fixed in 1.15.1 Patch available CNA
- @sveltejs/kit (npm) Vendor— Affected before 1.15.1 Fixed in 1.15.1 Patch available GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2
Remediation
- Fix · CNA kit (sveltejs) Fixed in 1.15.1
- Fix · GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2 @sveltejs/kit (npm) Fixed in 1.15.1 Advisory →
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2023-29003
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2
References
Patch 2
More sveltejs Sveltekit vulnerabilities
- TI-2023-13469 SvelteKit framework has Insufficient CSRF protection for CORS requests CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.8
- TI-2026-56726 SvelteKit before 2.52.2 CPU Exhaustion via Remote Form Deserialization CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.7
- TI-2026-56725 SvelteKit before 2.52.2 Memory Exhaustion via Remote Form Deserialization CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.7
- TI-2026-56724 SvelteKit 2.49.0 before 2.53.3 Denial of Service via form CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.7
- TI-2026-56721 SvelteKit before 2.69.1 Denial of Service via Remote Form CVSS 4.0MEDIUM 6.9
- TI-2026-56723 SvelteKit 2.38.0 before 2.60.1 Cross-User Data Disclosure via query.batch CVSS 4.0MEDIUM 5.9
Sources
- CVE-2023-29003 · CVE Program
- CVE-2023-29003 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-5p75-vc5g-8rv2 · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences