Read the docs
TI-2023-22614 Aliases CVE-2023-42449

Improper input validation in input-output-hk hydra

Priority HIGH 68CWE-20Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · High · High
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA.

Summary

Hydra is the two-layer scalability solution for Cardano. Prior to version 0.13.0, it is possible for a malicious head initializer to extract one or more PTs for the head they are initializing due to incorrect data validation logic in the head token minting policy which then results in an flawed check for burning the head ST in the `initial` validator. This is possible because it is not checked in `HeadTokens.hs` that the datums of the outputs at the `initial` validator are equal to the real head ID, and it is also not checked in the `off-chain code`. During the `Initial` state of the protocol, if the malicious initializer removes a PT from the Hydra scripts it becomes impossible for any other participant to reclaim any funds they have attempted to commit into the head, as to do so the Abort transaction must burn all the PTs for the head, but they cannot burn the PT which the attacker controls and so cannot satisfy this requirement. That means the initializer can lock the other participants committed funds forever or until they choose to return the PT (ransom). The malicious initializer can also use the PT to spoof that they have committed a particular TxO when progressing the head into the `Open` state. For example, they could say they committed a TxO residing at their address containing 100 ADA, but in fact this 100 ADA was not moved into the head, and thus in order for an other participant to perform the fanout they will be forced to pay the attacker the 100 ADA out of their own funds, as the fanout transaction must pay all the committed TxOs (even though the attacker did not really commit that TxO). They can do this by placing the PT in a UTxO with a well-formed `Commit` datum with whatever contents they like, then use this UTxO in the `collectCom` transaction. There may be other possible ways to abuse having control of a PT. Version 0.13.0 fixes this issue.

Why it matters now

Exploitation Proof of concept CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.0113 66th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Public exploit Yes 1 exploit referenceTagged by NVD
Fix Fixed hydra (input-output-hk): 0.13.0

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
Poc
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
input-output-hkhydrabefore 0.13.00.13.0Patch availableCNA
  • hydra Vendorinput-output-hk Affected before 0.13.0 Fixed in 0.13.0 Patch available CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:iohk:hydra:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*before 0.13.0Vulnerableinput-output-hk
  • cpe:2.3:a:iohk:hydra:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions before 0.13.0 Vulnerable ·input-output-hk

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA hydra (input-output-hk) Fixed in 0.13.0

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2023-42449

References

  • TI-2023-20049 Hydra's committed UTxOs at Commit validator and UTxOs at Initial validator can be spent arbitrarily by anyone CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2023-22613 Improper input validation in input-output-hk hydra CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.1
  • TI-2023-22897 Snapshot signature not including HeadID will allow replay attacks CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.5

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences