Read the docs
TI-2023-26761 Aliases CVE-2023-49096

Argument Injection in FFmpeg codec parameters in Jellyfin

Priority HIGH 73CWE-88Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Code execution
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · High · High
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-88.

Summary

Jellyfin is a Free Software Media System for managing and streaming media. In affected versions there is an argument injection in the VideosController, specifically the `/Videos/<itemId>/stream` and `/Videos/<itemId>/stream.<container>` endpoints which are present in the current Jellyfin version. Additional endpoints in the AudioController might also be vulnerable, as they differ only slightly in execution. Those endpoints are reachable by an unauthenticated user. In order to exploit this vulnerability an unauthenticated attacker has to guess an itemId, which is a completely random GUID. It’s a very unlikely case even for a large media database with lots of items. Without an additional information leak, this vulnerability shouldn’t be directly exploitable, even if the instance is reachable from the Internet. There are a lot of query parameters that get accepted by the method. At least two of those, videoCodec and audioCodec are vulnerable to the argument injection. The values can be traced through a lot of code and might be changed in the process. However, the fallback is to always use them as-is, which means we can inject our own arguments. Those arguments land in the command line of FFmpeg. Because UseShellExecute is always set to false, we can’t simply terminate the FFmpeg command and execute our own. It should only be possible to add additional arguments to FFmpeg, which is powerful enough as it stands. There is probably a way of overwriting an arbitrary file with malicious content. This vulnerability has been addressed in version 10.8.13. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.

Why it matters now

Exploitation Proof of concept CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.01251 69th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Public exploit Yes 1 exploit referenceTagged by NVD
Fix Fixed jellyfin (jellyfin): 10.8.13

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
Poc
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Total

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
jellyfinjellyfinbefore 10.8.1310.8.13Patch availableCNA
  • jellyfin Vendorjellyfin Affected before 10.8.13 Fixed in 10.8.13 Patch available CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:jellyfin:jellyfin:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*before 10.8.13Vulnerablejellyfin
  • cpe:2.3:a:jellyfin:jellyfin:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions before 10.8.13 Vulnerable ·jellyfin

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA jellyfin (jellyfin) Fixed in 10.8.13

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2023-49096

References

  • TI-2021-04500 Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Access in Jellyfin CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.7
  • TI-2021-10203 Unauthenticated GET requests through Remote Image endpoints CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.8
  • TI-2023-09464 In Jellyfin 10.8.x through 10.8.3, the name of a playlist is vulnerable to stored XSS. CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.4
  • TI-2023-09463 In Jellyfin 10.8.x through 10.8.3, the name of a collection is vulnerable to stored XSS. CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.4
  • TI-2026-24405 Jellyfin Possible Organization/Secret Compromise from dangerous CI implementation CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2026-27236 Jellyfin: Potential SSRF + Arbitrary file read via stream argument injection CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
See all 18 →

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences