Read the docs
TI-2024-32962 Aliases CVE-2024-49377GHSA-xvxq-g8hw-fx4g

Jinja2 Templates are vulnerable to XSS attacks due to their configuration in OctoPrint

Priority LOW 27CWE-79Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Cross-site scripting
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
Low · Low · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-79.

Summary

OctoPrint provides a web interface for controlling consumer 3D printers. OctoPrint versions up until and including 1.10.2 contain reflected XSS vulnerabilities in the login dialog and the standalone application key confirmation dialog. An attacker who successfully talked a victim into clicking on a specially crafted login link, or a malicious app running on a victim's computer triggering the application key workflow with specially crafted parameters and then redirecting the victim to the related standalone confirmation dialog could use this to retrieve or modify sensitive configuration settings, interrupt prints or otherwise interact with the OctoPrint instance in a malicious way. The above mentioned specific vulnerabilities of the login dialog and the standalone application key confirmation dialog have been patched in the bugfix release 1.10.3 by individual escaping of the detected locations. A global change throughout all of OctoPrint's templating system with the upcoming 1.11.0 release will handle this further, switching to globally enforced automatic escaping and thus reducing the attack surface in general. The latter will also improve the security of third party plugins. During a transition period, third party plugins will be able to opt into the automatic escaping. With OctoPrint 1.13.0, automatic escaping will be switched over to be enforced even for third party plugins, unless they explicitly opt-out.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00289 21st percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed OctoPrint (OctoPrint): 1.10.3OctoPrint (PyPI): 1.10.3

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
OctoPrintOctoPrintbefore 1.10.31.10.3Patch availableCNA
—OctoPrint (PyPI)before 1.10.31.10.3Patch availableGHSA-xvxq-g8hw-fx4g
  • OctoPrint VendorOctoPrint Affected before 1.10.3 Fixed in 1.10.3 Patch available CNA
  • OctoPrint (PyPI) Vendor— Affected before 1.10.3 Fixed in 1.10.3 Patch available GHSA-xvxq-g8hw-fx4g

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:octoprint:octoprint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*before 1.10.3VulnerableOctoPrint
  • cpe:2.3:a:octoprint:octoprint:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions before 1.10.3 Vulnerable ·OctoPrint

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA OctoPrint (OctoPrint) Fixed in 1.10.3
  • Fix · GHSA-xvxq-g8hw-fx4g OctoPrint (PyPI) Fixed in 1.10.3 Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2024-49377
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-xvxq-g8hw-fx4g

References

  • TI-2022-02830 Improper Privilege Management in octoprint/octoprint CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.8
  • TI-2022-03320 Failure to Sanitize Special Elements into a Different Plane (Special Element Injection) in octoprint/octoprint CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.0
  • TI-2022-02664 Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type in octoprint/octoprint CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.4
  • TI-2025-35988 OctoPrint is Vulnerable to RCE Attacks via Unsanitized Filename in File Upload CVSS 4.0HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2024-18796 OctoPrint XSS via the "Snapshot Test" feature in Classic Webcam plugin settings CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 4.8
  • TI-2022-02678 Insufficient Session Expiration in octoprint/octoprint CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 4.4
See all 22 →

Sources