Read the docs
TI-2024-38994 Aliases GHSA-vhmj-5q9r-mm9g

BlastRADIUS also affects eduMFA

Priority LOW 38CWE-924Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
—
Privileges required
—
User interaction
—
Attack complexity
—
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
—
Fix status
Fixed

No CVSS vector from any source. Fix status from GitHub.

Summary

### Summary BlastRADIUS (see blastradius.fail for details) also affects eduMFA prior version 2.2.0, because the Message-Authenticator attributes were not checked. ### Details Website with the vulnerability information blastradius.fail The original vulnerability has been assigned CVE-2024-3596 Case in vince: https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/456537 ### PoC There is no known proof-of-concept except for the attack shown in the paper from the researchers ### Impact An attacker can trigger an authentication flow with a RADIUS-backed token, intercept the RADIUS packet sent by eduMFA and modify the RADIUS server's answer, which would lead eduMFA to believe that the token is valid, even though the RADIUS servers answer was a reject.

Why it matters now

Fix Fixed edumfa (PyPI): 2.2.0

SSVC decision points

Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
—edumfa (PyPI)before 2.2.02.2.0Patch availableGHSA-vhmj-5q9r-mm9g
  • edumfa (PyPI) Vendor— Affected before 2.2.0 Fixed in 2.2.0 Patch available GHSA-vhmj-5q9r-mm9g

Remediation

  • Fix · GHSA-vhmj-5q9r-mm9g edumfa (PyPI) Fixed in 2.2.0 Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-03 Threatist record created from GHSA-vhmj-5q9r-mm9g

References

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences