Evervault Go SDK: Incomplete PCR Validation in Enclave Attestation for non-Evervault hosted Enclaves
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Impact type
- Security bypass
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · None
- Fix status
- Fixed
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-347.
Summary
Evervault is a payment security solution. A vulnerability was identified in the `evervault-go` SDK’s attestation verification logic in versions of `evervault-go` prior to 1.3.2 that may allow incomplete documents to pass validation. This may cause the client to trust an enclave operator that does not meet expected integrity guarantees. The exploitability of this issue is limited in Evervault-hosted environments as an attacker would require the pre-requisite ability to serve requests from specific evervault domain names, following from our ACME challenge based TLS certificate acquisition pipeline. The vulnerability primarily affects applications which only check PCR8. Though the efficacy is also reduced for applications that check all PCR values, the impact is largely remediated by checking PCR 0, 1 and 2. The identified issue has been addressed in version 1.3.2 by validating attestation documents before storing in the cache, and replacing the naive equality checks with a new SatisfiedBy check. Those who useevervault-go to attest Enclaves that are hosted outside of Evervault environments and cannot upgrade have two possible workarounds available. Modify the application logic to fail verification if PCR8 is not explicitly present and non-empty and/or add custom pre-validation to reject documents that omit any required PCRs.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- Poc
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| evervault | evervault-go | before 1.3.2 | 1.3.2 | Patch available | CNA |
| — | github.com/evervault/evervault-go (Go) | before 1.3.2 | 1.3.2 | Patch available | GHSA-88h9-77c7-p6w4 |
- evervault-go Vendorevervault Affected before 1.3.2 Fixed in 1.3.2 Patch available CNA
- github.com/evervault/evervault-go (Go) Vendor— Affected before 1.3.2 Fixed in 1.3.2 Patch available GHSA-88h9-77c7-p6w4
Remediation
- Fix · CNA evervault-go (evervault) Fixed in 1.3.2
- Fix · GHSA-88h9-77c7-p6w4 github.com/evervault/evervault-go (Go) Fixed in 1.3.2 Advisory →
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2025-64186
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-88h9-77c7-p6w4
References
Patch 2
Sources
- CVE-2025-64186 · CVE Program
- CVE-2025-64186 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-88h9-77c7-p6w4 · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences