Read the docs
TI-2026-13548 Aliases CVE-2026-16207GHSA-vv2j-8w59-8f8g

django-tastypie authentication.py ApiKeyAuthentication get request method with sensitive query strings

Priority LOW 29CWE-598Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
None
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
Low · None · None
Fix status
No fix listed

Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA.

Summary

A vulnerability was detected in django-tastypie up to 0.15.1. Impacted is the function ApiKeyAuthentication of the file tastypie/authentication.py. The manipulation results in use of get request method with sensitive query strings. The attack can be launched remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is considered difficult. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00622 50th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix No fix listed No fixed version in the sources yet

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
—django-tastypie0.15.0; 0.15.1—No fix listedCNA
  • django-tastypie Vendor— Affected 0.15.0; 0.15.1 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA

CPE names CNA · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:django-tastypie:django-tastypie:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*———
  • cpe:2.3:a:django-tastypie:django-tastypie:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions — — ·—

Remediation

No fixed version listed by the sources yet.

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat's page for this CVE →

Not affected: 1 product
  • Red Hat

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-16207
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-vv2j-8w59-8f8g
  3. 2026-11-05 EPSS moved to the 50th–90th percentile

References

Sources