Read the docs
TI-2026-26393 Aliases CVE-2026-34068GHSA-pf4j-pf3w-95f9

nimiq-transaction: UpdateValidator transactions allows voting key change without proof-of-knowledge

Priority LOW 29CWE-347Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-347.

Summary

nimiq-transaction provides the transaction primitive to be used in Nimiq's Rust implementation. Prior to version 1.3.0, the staking contract accepts `UpdateValidator` transactions that set `new_voting_key=Some(...)` while omitting `new_proof_of_knowledge`. this skips the proof-of-knowledge requirement that is needed to prevent BLS rogue-key attacks when public keys are aggregated. Because tendermint macro block justification verification aggregates validator voting keys and verifies a single aggregated BLS signature against that aggregate public key, a rogue-key voting key in the validator set can allow an attacker to forge a quorum-looking justification while only producing a single signature. While the impact is critical, the exploitability is low: The voting keys are fixed for the epoch, so the attacker would need to know the next epoch validator set (chosen through VRF), which is unlikely. The patch for this vulnerability is included as part of v1.3.0. No known workarounds are available.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00201 10th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed nimiq-transaction (nimiq): 1.3.0

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
nimiqnimiq-transactionbefore 1.3.01.3.0Patch availableCNA
—nimiq-transaction (crates.io)up to 0.2.0—No fix listedGHSA-pf4j-pf3w-95f9
  • nimiq-transaction Vendornimiq Affected before 1.3.0 Fixed in 1.3.0 Patch available CNA
  • nimiq-transaction (crates.io) Vendor— Affected up to 0.2.0 Fixed in — No fix listed GHSA-pf4j-pf3w-95f9

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:nimiq:nimiq_proof-of-stake:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:*before 1.3.0Vulnerablenimiq
  • cpe:2.3:a:nimiq:nimiq_proof-of-stake:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:* Versions before 1.3.0 Vulnerable ·nimiq

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA nimiq-transaction (nimiq) Fixed in 1.3.0

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-34068
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-pf4j-pf3w-95f9

References

  • TI-2026-26389 nimiq-account: Vesting insufficient funds error can panic CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.2
  • TI-2026-25867 nimiq-block has skip block quorum bypass via out-of-range BitSet indices & u16 truncation CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.6
  • TI-2026-27598 nimiq/core-rs-albatross: Panic in history index request handlers when a full node runs without the history index CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-26390 nimiq-primitives: Node crash due to missing interlink validation in election macro block proposals CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-26388 network-libp2p: Peer can crash the node by opening discovery protocol substream twice CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-25612 nimiq/core-rs-albatross: Discovery handshake limit could underflow and later provoke a deterministic overflow panic CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
See all 14 →

Sources