TLS 1.2 and DTLS client accepts unoffered anonymous cipher suite, bypassing server authentication
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Impact type
- —
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · None
- Fix status
- Partial Red Hat: 1 fixed, 3 without a fix
Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and Red Hat.
Summary
The Erlang/OTP ssl TLS 1.2 (and earlier) and DTLS client does not verify that the cipher suite selected by the server in ServerHello was among the suites offered by the client in ClientHello. The client-side tls_handshake:hello/5 handler validates the negotiated protocol version and the downgrade sentinel but hands the server-chosen suite directly to ssl_handshake:handle_server_hello_extensions/9, which installs it without a membership check. The TLS 1.3 client path performs this check (per RFC 8446), so it is not affected. An on-path attacker between the client and the intended server can respond with a ServerHello selecting an anonymous key exchange suite such as TLS_DH_anon_* or TLS_ECDH_anon_* that the client never offered. Anonymous suites do not require the server to present a certificate, so the entire verify_peer and cacerts configuration is bypassed: the attacker completes the handshake with its own ephemeral parameters, no certificate is validated, no hostname is checked, and ssl:connect returns {ok, Socket}. All subsequent application traffic is readable and modifiable by the attacker. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.15, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.4, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.4, corresponding to ssl from 5.3.4 before 11.2.12.11, from 11.3 before 11.6.0.4, and from 11.7 before 11.7.4. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to ssl before 5.3.4, is affected is unknown.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- None
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erlang | OTP | 17.0 to before 27.3.4.15; 28.0 to before 28.5.0.4; 29.0 to before 29.0.4 | 27.3.4.15, 28.5.0.4, 29.0.4 | Patch available | CNA |
| Erlang | OTP | 5.3.4 to before 11.2.12.11; 11.3 to before 11.6.0.4; 11.7 to before 11.7.4 | 11.2.12.11, 11.6.0.4, 11.7.4 | Patch available | CNA |
- OTP VendorErlang Affected 17.0 to before 27.3.4.15; 28.0 to before 28.5.0.4; 29.0 to before 29.0.4 Fixed in 27.3.4.15, 28.5.0.4, 29.0.4 Patch available CNA
- OTP VendorErlang Affected 5.3.4 to before 11.2.12.11; 11.3 to before 11.6.0.4; 11.7 to before 11.7.4 Fixed in 11.2.12.11, 11.6.0.4, 11.7.4 Patch available CNA
CPE configurations NVD · 2
Remediation
- Fix · CNA OTP (Erlang) Fixed in 27.3.4.15, 28.5.0.4, 29.0.4
- Fix · CNA OTP (Erlang) Fixed in 11.2.12.11, 11.6.0.4, 11.7.4
Red Hat 1 advisory
- RHSA-2026:47009 Released 2026-07-28 · Red Hat rating CriticalRed Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Red Hat Hardened Images erlang27-27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1@aarch64, erlang27-27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1@src, erlang27-27.3.4.15-0.1.hum1@x86_64 +47
Fixed in the same release
Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.
- Release ·
Erlang OTP 17.0, 27.3.4.15 and 2 more versions
2 records Highest priority Priority MEDIUM 1 MEDIUM, 1 LOW
Other records, highest priority first
- TI-2026-42390 Megaco flex scanner buffer overflow via oversized property parm namePriority LOW 37
Vendor assessments
Red Hat
Red Hat rating: Critical. Red Hat's page for this CVE →
| Product | Status | Plan or fix |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 16.2 | Affected | No fix yet |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 17.1 | Affected | No fix yet |
| Red Hat OpenStack Platform 18.0 | Affected | No fix yet |
| Red Hat Hardened Images | Fixed | RHSA-2026:47009 |
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-55953
References
Patch 5
- https://cna.erlef.org/cves/CVE-2026-55953.html
- https://osv.dev/vulnerability/EEF-CVE-2026-55953
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/064e236414614f9085cbbbd6eacf0e43c02d1b4b
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/0a82596d425abe43dc2e0b3d74aa1557ef74051c
- https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/e6ff938116b2872bccc478af7fefb56627285b77
More Erlang/otp vulnerabilities
- TI-2025-23504 Erlang/OTP SSH Vulnerable to Pre-Authentication RCE KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
- TI-2023-26623 The SSH transport protocol with certain OpenSSH extensions, found in OpenSSH before 9.6… CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.9
- TI-2017-14604 The Erlang otp TLS server answers with different TLS alerts to different error types in… CVSS 3.0MEDIUM 5.9
- TI-2026-36669 Stack buffer overflow in SCTP error cause parsing in inet_drv allows remote VM crash CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.8
- TI-2022-17230 In Erlang/OTP before 23.3.4.15, 24.x before 24.3.4.2, and 25.x before 25.0.2, there is a… CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2016-08327 An issue was discovered in Erlang/OTP 18.x. CVSS 3.0CRITICAL 9.8
Sources
- CVE-2026-55953 · CVE Program
- CVE-2026-55953 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- CVE-2026-55953 · Red Hat security data · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences