Read the docs
TI-2026-44126 Aliases CVE-2026-61598GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj

Client mass-assignment of arbitrary view attributes via the default dj-model update_model handler

Priority LOW 32CWE-915Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Attack requirements
None
Impact type
Tampering
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-915.

Summary

djust provides Phoenix LiveView-style reactive server-side rendering for Django with Rust-powered performance. Prior to version 1.0.7, `djust.mixins.model_binding.ModelBindingMixin` provides a default `update_model` event handler and is part of the LiveView base MRO, so every LiveView exposes it. It `setattr`s a view attribute whose name is client-supplied (`field`), gated only by: reject `_`-prefixed names; reject a 14-entry denylist of framework internals (`FORBIDDEN_MODEL_FIELDS`); optional `allowed_model_fields` which defaults to None = allow all; and `hasattr` existence. As a result, a client can set any public, existing view attribute — not just the fields actually bound with `dj-model=` in the rendered template. The denylist covers framework plumbing but nothing about developer business/authz state, and the allowlist is opt-in (off by default). A developer who binds one `dj-model="search"` input and also keeps `self.account_id` / `self.is_admin` / `self.total_price` as view state does not realize a client can set ALL of them via `{type:event, event:"update_model", params:{field, value}}` over the WebSocket. Type coercion matches the target attribute's type (so `"true"` -> bool True), aiding the attacker. This issue is fixed in djust 1.0.7. As a workaround, set `allowed_model_fields` explicitly on every view using dj-model (or subclassing LiveView) to the minimal list of bindable fields; do not keep authorization/ownership state in public view attributes that share the view with dj-model bindings.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00429 37th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed djust (djust-org): 1.0.7djust (PyPI): 1.0.7

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
djust-orgdjustbefore 1.0.71.0.7Patch availableCNA
—djust (PyPI)before 1.0.71.0.7Patch availableGHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj
  • djust Vendordjust-org Affected before 1.0.7 Fixed in 1.0.7 Patch available CNA
  • djust (PyPI) Vendor— Affected before 1.0.7 Fixed in 1.0.7 Patch available GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA djust (djust-org) Fixed in 1.0.7
  • Fix · GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj djust (PyPI) Fixed in 1.0.7 Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-61598
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-cc7c-9jff-58wj

References

  • TI-2026-40112 Improper authorization in djust-org djust CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.2
  • TI-2026-78534 Arbitrary file read in djust find_handlers_for_template MCP tool CVSS 3.1LOW 3.3
  • TI-2026-44127 djust has an unauthenticated arbitrary module import via the WebSocket/SSE view-mount path CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.8
  • TI-2026-44122 djust has an authorization bypass on the WebSocket/SSE mount path CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2026-44121 Cross-site request forgery in djust-org djust CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.1
  • TI-2026-44119 djust: Unsigned client state snapshot is restored as trusted view state (privilege escalation / state injection) CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.1
See all 13 →

Sources