Authentication bypass by spoofing in Eclipse Arrowhead
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- Present
- Impact type
- Security bypass, Spoofing
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · None
- Fix status
- No fix listed
Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-290 and CWE-295.
Summary
In Eclipse Arrowhead versions from 5.0.0 to 5.2.1 when the MQTT API is enabled with the certificate authentication policy, CertificateMqttFilter parses an X.509 certificate that the client sends inside the MQTT message payload (the authentication field of MqttRequestTemplate) and treats its Subject DN as the authenticated identity. The certificate is decoded with CertificateFactory.generateCertificate() but its signature is never verified and its issuer chain is never validated against any trust store. Authorisation is reduced to two string comparisons on attacker-supplied data: the DN-qualifier must equal "sy" or "op", and the cloud-name part of the CN must match the server's. Both values are public (the cloud name is in the server's own TLS certificate). An attacker who can publish to the MQTT broker can therefore mint a self-signed certificate with CN=Sysop.<cloud>.<org>.arrowhead.eu, dnQualifier=op, send it as the authentication field, and be authenticated as the cloud's system operator with isSysOp == true. This passes the downstream ManagementServiceMqttFilter (request.isSysOp() → allowed) and gives full management access over MQTT. The HTTP CertificateFilter is not affected — it reads the certificate from jakarta.servlet.request.X509Certificate, which Tomcat populates only after a successful mTLS handshake against the configured trust store.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- None
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Foundation | Eclipse Arrowhead | 5.0.0 – 5.2.1 | — | No fix listed | CNA |
- Eclipse Arrowhead VendorEclipse Foundation Affected 5.0.0 – 5.2.1 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA
Remediation
No fixed version listed by the sources yet.
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-82180
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-268c-4cfr-fmcj
More Eclipse Foundation vulnerabilities
- TI-2023-23979 The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because… KEVCVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2026-81947 Unauthenticated command injection in Eclipse Che che-machine-exec CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2026-13216 CWE-863: ABAC authorization bypass via trailing slash route normalization in Eclipse BaSyx Go Components CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2026-06514 Path traversal in Eclipse BaSyx CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
- TI-2026-01382 In the Eclipse Theia Website repository, the GitHub Actions workflow… CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
- TI-2026-74697 Authentication bypass in Eclipse Jetty EthereumAuthenticator CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
Sources
- CVE-2026-82180 · CVE Program
- CVE-2026-82180 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-268c-4cfr-fmcj · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences