An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5.
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- High
- Impact type
- —
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- None · High · Low
- Fix status
- Fixed
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and Red Hat.
Summary
An issue was discovered in HAProxy 3.3.0 through 3.4.4 and in 3.5-dev1 through 3.5-dev5. Exploitation requires an HTTP/3 frontend: HAProxy must be built with QUIC support and configured with a QUIC bind listener, and the affected traffic must reach a backend over HTTP/1.1 using chunked transfer coding on a reused connection. Under those conditions, when an HTTP/3 request carries no Content-Length header, the HTTP/3 multiplexer credits the length declared in a DATA frame header to the stream endpoint's known-input-payload estimate at the moment the frame header is decoded, before the payload has been received, and that declared length is emitted verbatim as the HTTP/1.1 chunk size. A remote unauthenticated client that declares more payload than it delivers and then ends the stream causes HAProxy to announce a chunk larger than the bytes it writes and to return the connection to the idle pool in a desynchronized state. The result is potential HTTP request smuggling on reused backend connections: an attacker can place a request past a frontend rule such as a path-based http-request deny, so that the smuggled request is never seen by HAProxy's HTTP analysis, and can cause concurrent clients' requests, including their request lines and Authorization headers, to be consumed as the attacker's request body and lost. Exploitation is not deterministic; it depends on a race with backend connection pooling, succeeding in a majority of but not all trials during testing, and can be retried freely. The mechanism was introduced in 3.3-dev10; releases 3.2.x and earlier are unaffected.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- None
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Partial
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
Remediation
- Fix · CNA HAProxy (HAProxy) Fixed in 3.5-dev6
Red Hat 1 advisory
- RHSA-2026:60634 Released 2026-08-27 · Red Hat rating ImportantRed Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Red Hat Hardened Images haproxy-3.0.27-0.1.hum1@aarch64, haproxy-3.0.27-0.1.hum1@src, haproxy-3.0.27-0.1.hum1@x86_64
Vendor assessments
Red Hat
Red Hat rating: Important. Red Hat's page for this CVE →
| Product | Status | Plan or fix |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Hardened Images | Fixed | RHSA-2026:60634 |
Not affected: 8 products
- Red Hat Ceph Storage 5
- Red Hat Ceph Storage 9
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9
- Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 4
- Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform 5
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-90678
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-9f9v-4h96-wh6m
- 2026-11-05 Affected versions changed · Red Hat
References
More HAProxy vulnerabilities
- TI-2020-08973 In hpack_dht_insert in hpack-tbl.c in the HPACK decoder in HAProxy 1.8 through 2.x before… CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.8
- TI-2023-21094 HAProxy through 2.0.32, 2.1.x and 2.2.x through 2.2.30, 2.3.x and 2.4.x through 2.4.23… CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.2
- TI-2019-10602 HAProxy through 2.0.2 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (ha_panic) via… CVSS 3.0HIGH 7.5
- TI-2021-17418 An integer overflow exists in HAProxy 2.0 through 2.5 in htx_add_header that can be… CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
- TI-2016-04651 HAproxy 1.6.x before 1.6.6, when a deny comes from a reqdeny rule, allows remote… CVSS 3.0HIGH 7.5
- TI-2026-25946 An issue was discovered in HAProxy before 3.3.6. CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.8
Sources
- CVE-2026-90678 · CVE Program
- CVE-2026-90678 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-9f9v-4h96-wh6m · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
- CVE-2026-90678 · Red Hat security data · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences