Read the docs

pacioli consent gate lets markers cancel unrelated submitted documents

Priority LOW 25CWE-863Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-863.

Summary

pacioli from 0.9.6 before 0.10.0 and pacioli-guard from 0.9.6 before 0.10.0 are affected. The pacioli-guard consent gate lets nested cancellations reuse any enclosing consent without checking that it authorizes cancellation (CWE-863). An attacker with an API key carrying the require_consent scope can cancel another pre-existing submitted document under a valid submit marker, reversing its ledger effect.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

Description from the CNA

pacioli provides least-privilege governance and a governed agent broker for ERPNext. From version 0.9.6 until version 0.10.0, the pacioli-guard document-layer consent gate allows nested cancellation operations to ride any consent established by an enclosing governed act without checking whether the marker authorizes cancellation. A credential with API Key Scope.require_consent can submit a caller-controlled Sales Invoice or other supported document under a valid human-minted submit marker and reach Document.cancel() for a different pre-existing submitted document, bypassing the marker's document and act binding, single-use spend, and denial audit. The unauthorized cancellation can reverse the target document's ledger effect; principals without a consent-gated grant are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00233 14th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed pacioli (john-broadway): 0.10.0pacioli-guard (PyPI): 0.10.0

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
john-broadwaypacioli0.9.6 to before 0.10.00.10.0Patch availableCNA
—pacioli-guard (PyPI)0.9.6 to before 0.10.00.10.0Patch availableGHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4
  • pacioli Vendorjohn-broadway Affected 0.9.6 to before 0.10.0 Fixed in 0.10.0 Patch available CNA
  • pacioli-guard (PyPI) Vendor— Affected 0.9.6 to before 0.10.0 Fixed in 0.10.0 Patch available GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4

Remediation

Upgrade pacioli-guard to version 0.10.0 on PyPI, which fixes this flaw. The sources list no fixed version for pacioli.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

  • Fix · CNA pacioli (john-broadway) Fixed in 0.10.0
  • Fix · GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4 pacioli-guard (PyPI) Fixed in 0.10.0 Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-10 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-107841
  2. 2026-10-10 Alias added: GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4
  3. 2026-10-10 Fix available: PyPI/[email protected] · GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4
  4. 2026-10-10 CVSS score added · GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4
  5. 2026-10-10 Weakness changed · GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4
  6. 2026-10-10 5 new references · GHSA-3hj7-6vmj-h8v4

References

Sources