Read the docs
TI-2026-71312 Aliases CVE-2026-78673GHSA-25fm-f8v8-9pqg

IBM Maximo AI Service Improper Input Validation

Priority LOW 33CWE-20Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · None · High
Fix status
No fix listed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA.

Summary

IBM Maximo AI Service 9.1.0 and 9.2.0 contain an improper input validation flaw (CWE-20) that lets a remote attacker cause a denial of service. The CVSS 3.1 base score is 7.5 (HIGH), with high availability impact and no privileges or user interaction required. CISA has not added it to KEV, and its SSVC assessment rates exploitation as none and automatable as no.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

Description from the CNA

IBM Maximo AI Service 9.1.0, and 9.2.0 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper input validation.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00313 24th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix No fix listed No fixed version in the sources yet

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
IBMMaximo AI Service9.1.0; 9.2.0—No fix listedCNA
  • Maximo AI Service VendorIBM Affected 9.1.0; 9.2.0 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA

CPE names CNA · 2

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:maximo_ai_service:9.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*9.1.0—IBM
cpe:2.3:a:ibm:maximo_ai_service:9.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*9.2.0—IBM
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:maximo_ai_service:9.1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 9.1.0 — ·IBM
  • cpe:2.3:a:ibm:maximo_ai_service:9.2.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 9.2.0 — ·IBM

Remediation

No fixed version is listed for IBM Maximo AI Service 9.1.0 or 9.2.0. Check IBM's advisory for a fix or workaround.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

Fixed in the same release

Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.

  • Advisory ·

    IBM Maximo AI Service — ibm.com/support/pages/node/7290473

    4 records Highest priority Priority LOW 4 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

    • TI-2026-71345 Denial of service in IBM Maximo AI Service from malformed framesPriority LOW 39
    • TI-2026-71343 Denial of service in IBM Maximo AI Service via uncontrolled recursionPriority LOW 39
    • TI-2026-71342 Uncontrolled resource consumption in IBM Maximo AI ServicePriority LOW 39
    Show all 4 records → Advisory →

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-12 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-78673
  2. 2026-10-13 Alias added: GHSA-25fm-f8v8-9pqg
  3. 2026-10-13 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  4. 2026-10-13 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW

References

Patch 1

  • TI-2026-08085 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Auto-Login Bypass and Code Validation KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2022-23774 IBM Aspera Faspex code execution KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2020-03794 Improper authentication in IBM Data Risk Manager KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2019-03441 Code injection in IBM Planning Analytics KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2017-03639 Improper handling of exceptional conditions in Apache Struts KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2015-06198 Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT… KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
See all 9711 →

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences