Read the docs

Authentication bypass in openGauss-server replication connections

Priority LOW 31CWE-288Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
High
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-288.

Summary

openGauss-server versions 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 5.0.x, 5.1.0, 6.0.x, 7.0.0-RC1, 7.0.0-RC2 and 7.0.0-RC3 are affected. The HADR/SW replication sender path skips the internal connection check, and its authentication check lacks the full pg_hba checks, such as the remote trust prohibition (CWE-288). A remote attacker with high privileges can authenticate a replication connection from a non-internal network and read backup and log data through the replication protocol.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-28

Description from the CNA

在 openGauss-server 的 src/common/backend/libpq/hba.cpp 中,复制连接认证存在访问控制绕过。hba_getauthmethod() 在处理 HADR/SW 复制发送方时,不要求 is_node_internal_connection(),直接调用 check_hba_replication()。check_hba_replication() 仅按 replication 标记做弱匹配,缺少普通 check_hba() 中的远程 trust 禁止等完整校验。因此,非内部网络的 HADR/SW 复制连接可绕过内部连接限制和完整 pg_hba 策略完成认证,进而通过复制协议读取备份与日志数据。 此问题随 HADR 复制发送方绕过内部连接校验进入代码,自 3.0.0 起即存在。受影响版本包括 3.0.x、3.1.x、5.0.x、5.1.0、6.0.x,以及 7.0.0-RC1、7.0.0-RC2、7.0.0-RC3。该问题已在 7.0.0-LTS版本修复,通过要求 HADR/SW 复制发送方必须经过 is_node_internal_connection 校验,使外部复制连接改走普通 check_hba() 并触发禁止远程 trust 策略。修复pr见https://gitcode.com/opengauss/openGauss-server/pull/9757。

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00361 30th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed openGauss-server (openGauss-server): 7.0.0-LTS

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Total

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
openGauss-serveropenGauss-server3.0.0-3.0.5; 3.1.0-3.1.1; 5.0.0-RC1; 5.0.0-5.0.3; 6.0.0-RC1; 6.0.0-6.0.6; 7.0.0-RC1, 7.0.0-RC2, 7.0.0-RC37.0.0-LTSPatch availableCNA
  • openGauss-server VendoropenGauss-server Affected 3.0.0-3.0.5; 3.1.0-3.1.1; 5.0.0-RC1; 5.0.0-5.0.3; 6.0.0-RC1; 6.0.0-6.0.6; 7.0.0-RC1, 7.0.0-RC2, 7.0.0-RC3 Fixed in 7.0.0-LTS Patch available CNA

Remediation

Upgrade to openGauss-server 7.0.0-LTS, which requires HADR/SW replication senders to pass the internal connection check. The fix is in pull request 9757 of the openGauss-server repository on GitCode.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-28

  • Fix · CNA openGauss-server (openGauss-server) Fixed in 7.0.0-LTS

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-19 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-111438
  2. 2026-10-19 Alias added: GHSA-65mg-g3fh-wfvj
  3. 2026-10-19 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  4. 2026-10-19 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW

References

  • TI-2026-76229 Heap overflow in openGauss HLL unpacking from missing length check CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.1
  • TI-2026-76236 Unsafe reflection in openGauss JDBC LogFactory enables class loading CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.0
  • TI-2026-12011 openGauss存在非法内存访问导致DoS漏洞 CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.9
  • TI-2026-76281 Missing permission check in openGauss lets users read table file blocks CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 4.3

Sources