Read the docs
TI-2026-76348 Aliases CVE-2026-85243GHSA-rgg6-2q97-gxhm

Integrity check skipped in Apache Camel Crypto PGP decryption

Priority LOW 27CWE-354Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · High · None
Fix status
Partial Red Hat: 3 without a fix

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and Red Hat.

Summary

Apache Camel from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5 and from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1 has an improper validation of integrity check value flaw (CWE-354) in its Crypto PGP component. The unmarshal operation skips the integrity check when a message uses the legacy symmetrically encrypted data packet, so the sender or anyone able to rewrite the message in transit can bypass integrity protection of the decrypted content.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-06

Description from the CNA

Improper Validation of Integrity Check Value vulnerability in Apache Camel Crypto PGP component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. unmarshal() verified the modification detection code only when the message was an OpenPGP symmetrically encrypted integrity protected data packet. The older symmetrically encrypted data packet carries no such code, and OpenPGP's CFB mode is malleable without one, so a message using that packet skipped the check altogether. The packet type is chosen by whoever produced the message, which left the sender - or anyone able to rewrite the message in transit - deciding whether the integrity check applied at all. The existing integrity option governs marshalling only and had no decrypt-side counterpart, so a deployment could not require integrity protection on the messages it accepted. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. A requireIntegrityProtection option, defaulting to true, now rejects a message that is not integrity protected. Note that signatureVerificationOption still defaults to optional, so a message carrying no signature is accepted; the two options together are what give a decrypted message authenticity and not only confidentiality. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, reject messages that do not use the integrity protected packet before they reach the data format. Routes that must interoperate with a sender still emitting the legacy packet should set requireIntegrityProtection=false after upgrading, and treat the decrypted content as unauthenticated.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00367 30th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Partial Apache Camel (Apache Software Foundation): 4.18.5, 4.22.1, 4.23.0Red Hat: 3 without a fix

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
ApacheApache Camel4.0.0 to before 4.18.5; 4.19.0 to before 4.22.14.18.5, 4.22.1, 4.23.0Patch availableCNA
  • Apache Camel VendorApache Affected 4.0.0 to before 4.18.5; 4.19.0 to before 4.22.1 Fixed in 4.18.5, 4.22.1, 4.23.0 Patch available CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*4.0.0 to before 4.18.5; 4.19.0 to before 4.22.1VulnerableApache
  • cpe:2.3:a:apache:camel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 4.0.0 to before 4.18.5; 4.19.0 to before 4.22.1 Vulnerable ·Apache

Remediation

Upgrade Apache Camel to 4.18.5 on the 4.18.x LTS stream, 4.22.1 on the 4.22.x LTS stream, or 4.23.0. Red Hat Fuse 7 has no fix planned, and the Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3 and the Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4 have no fix available. Until upgrading, reject messages that do not use the integrity protected packet before they reach the data format.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-06

  • Fix · CNA Apache Camel (Apache Software Foundation) Fixed in 4.18.5, 4.22.1, 4.23.0

Fixed in the same release

Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.

  • Release ·

    Apache Camel 4.18.5, 4.22.1

    39 records Highest priority Priority HIGH 6 HIGH, 9 MEDIUM, 24 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

    • TI-2026-76322 Unsafe deserialization in Apache Camel camel-hazelcastPriority HIGH 82
    • TI-2026-76339 Path traversal in Apache Camel azure-files componentPriority HIGH 74
    • TI-2026-76330 Path traversal in Apache Camel FTP consumer escapes polled directoryPriority HIGH 74

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Moderate. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

ProductStatusPlan or fix
Red Hat Fuse 7AffectedNo fix planned: Out of support scope
Red Hat build of Apache Camel 4 for Quarkus 3AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred
Red Hat build of Apache Camel for Spring Boot 4AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-19 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-85243
  2. 2026-10-19 Alias added: GHSA-rgg6-2q97-gxhm
  3. 2026-10-20 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  4. 2026-10-20 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW
  5. 2026-11-06 Affected versions changed · Red Hat
  6. 2026-11-06 CVSS score added · Red Hat

References

  • TI-2026-76322 Unsafe deserialization in Apache Camel camel-hazelcast CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2026-18973 Apache Camel: Camel-Keycloak: Cross-Realm Token Acceptance Bypass in KeycloakSecurityPolicy CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2026-76339 Path traversal in Apache Camel azure-files component CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2026-76330 Path traversal in Apache Camel FTP consumer escapes polled directory CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2025-20435 Apache Camel: Camel Message Header Injection via Improper Filtering CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.6
  • TI-2026-34899 Apache Camel: Camel-CXF Message Header Injection via Missing Inbound Filtering CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
See all 116 →

Sources