Read the docs
TI-2026-79418 Aliases CVE-2026-114611

OCO-Server MDM endpoint accepts self-signed enrollment signatures

Priority HIGH 80CWE-295Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Spoofing
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-295.

Summary

OCO-Server versions before 1.2.3 are affected. Its Apple MDM enrollment endpoint skips certificate chain validation of signed enrollment plists, so it accepts self-signed certificates (CWE-295). An unauthenticated remote attacker who knows a device's serial number can obtain that device's MDM certificate and private key and hijack its record. The attacker can then impersonate the device on later MDM traffic.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

Description from the CNA

OCO-Server is a self-hosted endpoint management application for computer inventory, software deployment, and mobile device management. Prior to 1.2.3,the Apple MDM enrollment endpoint `frontend/api-mdm.php` verifies the signed enrollment-request plist with `openssl_pkcs7_verify(..., PKCS7_NOVERIFY, ...)`. `PKCS7_NOVERIFY` disables signer certificate chain and trust validation, so the signature only has to be self-consistent with whatever certificate is embedded in the PKCS#7 blob. A self-signed certificate from an unrelated attacker is accepted. Because the endpoint trusts the `SERIAL` field taken from the unverified payload, anyone who knows a registered device's serial number can sign a forged plist (`SERIAL` = victim device, attacker-chosen `UDID`) with an arbitrary self-signed certificate; POST it unauthenticated to `/api-mdm.php/profile` (Content-Type: `application/pkcs7-signature`); and receive the victim device's freshly minted MDM identity: a certificate with `CN=<serial>` issued by the server's internal MDM device CA, bundled with its private key in a PKCS#12 payload inside the returned `.mobileconfig` enrollment profile. Additionally, the victim's `mobile_device` database row is silently overwritten with the attacker-supplied `UDID` (device-record hijack). With the stolen certificate and key, the attacker can impersonate the victim device on all subsequent MDM traffic (`/checkin`, `/mdm`, `/parameters`), which authenticate callers by the certificate CN (the serial number) via `checkSignature()` in the same file. This yields control over the victim device's MDM relationship: reading its management data, replacing its push token, and disrupting or redirecting its enrollment. Version 1.2.3 fixes the issue.

Why it matters now

Exploitation Proof of concept CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00324 25th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed OCO-Server (schorschii): 1.2.3

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
Poc
Automatable
Yes
Technical impact
Total

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
schorschiiOCO-Serverbefore 1.2.31.2.3Patch availableCNA
  • OCO-Server Vendorschorschii Affected before 1.2.3 Fixed in 1.2.3 Patch available CNA

Remediation

Upgrade OCO-Server to version 1.2.3, which fixes the issue.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

  • Fix · CNA OCO-Server (schorschii) Fixed in 1.2.3

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-22 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-114611
  2. 2026-10-23 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW
  3. 2026-10-29 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  4. 2026-10-29 Priority changed: LOW → HIGH

References

  • TI-2026-79274 Stored cross-site scripting in OCO-Server via agent hostnames CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.4
  • TI-2026-79292 Authorization bypass in OCO-Server Self-Service Portal uninstall jobs CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.5

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences