Read the docs
TI-2026-80330 Aliases CVE-2026-89209GHSA-c6gm-hvjc-mr8p

Authentication bypass by SAML assertion replay in Siemens Mendix SAML

Priority LOW 35CWE-294Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Passive
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
None
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · High · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-294.

Summary

Siemens Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) and Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) versions before V4.2.4, and Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible) versions before V3.6.29, are affected. The module does not properly protect against SAML assertion replay in IdP-initiated authentication flows (CWE-294). An unauthenticated remote attacker can gain unauthorized access to the application by replaying a valid SAML response.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-31

Description from the CNA

A vulnerability has been identified in Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) (All versions < V4.2.4), Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) (All versions < V4.2.4), Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible) (All versions < V3.6.29). Affected versions of the module do not properly protect against SAML assertion replay in IdP-initiated authentication flows. This could allow unauthenticated remote attackers to gain unauthorized access to the application by replaying a valid SAML response.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00259 17th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) (Siemens): V4.2.4Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) (Siemens): V4.2.4+1 more product

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Total

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
SiemensMendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible)before V4.2.4V4.2.4Patch availableCNA
SiemensMendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible)before V4.2.4V4.2.4Patch availableCNA
SiemensMendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible)before V3.6.29V3.6.29Patch availableCNA
  • Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) VendorSiemens Affected before V4.2.4 Fixed in V4.2.4 Patch available CNA
  • Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) VendorSiemens Affected before V4.2.4 Fixed in V4.2.4 Patch available CNA
  • Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible) VendorSiemens Affected before V3.6.29 Fixed in V3.6.29 Patch available CNA

Remediation

Update Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) and Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) to V4.2.4 and Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible) to V3.6.29.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-31

  • Fix · CNA Mendix SAML (Mendix 10 compatible) (Siemens) Fixed in V4.2.4
  • Fix · CNA Mendix SAML (Mendix 11 compatible) (Siemens) Fixed in V4.2.4
  • Fix · CNA Mendix SAML (Mendix 9 compatible) (Siemens) Fixed in V3.6.29

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-26 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-89209
  2. 2026-10-27 Alias added: GHSA-c6gm-hvjc-mr8p
  3. 2026-10-27 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW
  4. 2026-10-31 CISA SSVC decision points changed

References

  • TI-2026-20057 Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiWeb KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.4
  • TI-2025-26358 tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-18911 Heap-based buffer overflow in Fortinet FortiSwitchManager KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-09686 Type confusion in Google Chrome KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2022-07142 Code injection in Spring Framework KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2021-19919 Apache Log4j2 JNDI features do not protect against attacker controlled LDAP and other JNDI related endpoints KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
See all 2487 →

Sources