Read the docs

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS

Priority LOW 24CWE-918Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
Low · Low · None
Fix status
No fix listed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA.

Summary

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 contains a server-side request forgery flaw (CWE-918) in which the server can be made to send requests it should not. An authenticated attacker can send unauthorized requests from the system, which may enable network enumeration or support other attacks. The attack can be launched remotely by a user with low privileges and requires no user interaction.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-04

Description from the CNA

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.0018 7th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix No fix listed No fixed version in the sources yet

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
IBMLangflow OSS1.0.0 – 1.12.3—No fix listedCNA
  • Langflow OSS VendorIBM Affected 1.0.0 – 1.12.3 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*1.0.0 to before 1.12.4VulnerableLangflow
  • cpe:2.3:a:langflow:langflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions 1.0.0 to before 1.12.4 Vulnerable ·Langflow

Remediation

The sources list no fixed version for IBM Langflow OSS.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-04

Fixed in the same release

Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.

  • Advisory ·

    IBM Langflow OSS — ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293015

    16 records Highest priority Priority MEDIUM 5 MEDIUM, 11 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

    • TI-2026-82551 Command injection in IBM Langflow OSS enables remote code executionPriority MEDIUM 50
    • TI-2026-82547 Deserialization flaw in IBM Langflow OSS allows remote code executionPriority MEDIUM 44
    • TI-2026-82549 Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS lets attackers run codePriority MEDIUM 41

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-29 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-104331
  2. 2026-10-29 Alias added: GHSA-xjf3-4qwr-q7w2
  3. 2026-10-31 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW
  4. 2026-11-04 CISA SSVC decision points changed

References

  • TI-2026-08085 Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Auto-Login Bypass and Code Validation KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2022-23774 IBM Aspera Faspex code execution KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2020-03794 Improper authentication in IBM Data Risk Manager KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2019-03441 Code injection in IBM Planning Analytics KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2017-03639 Improper handling of exceptional conditions in Apache Struts KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2015-06198 Serialized-object interfaces in certain IBM analytics, business solutions, cognitive, IT… KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
See all 9711 →

Sources