Read the docs

Missing authorization in MLflow lets users escalate privileges

Priority LOW 26CWE-862Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
Low · Low · None
Fix status
Deferred Red Hat: fix deferred

Attack profile from CVSS 3.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and Red Hat. Impact type from CWE-862.

Summary

MLflow versions from 3.14.0 are affected. The Tracking Server's BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS configuration does not check authorization before it grants access to functionality (CWE-862). A remote attacker who has authenticated with low privileges can escalate privileges to resources normally protected from the user.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-04

Description from the CNA

MLflow Tracking Server Issues Missing Authorization Privilege Escalation Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of MLflow. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the BEFORE_REQUEST_HANDLERS. The issue results from the lack of authorization prior to allowing access to functionality. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to escalate privileges to resources normally protected from the user. Was ZDI-CAN-32108.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00225 13th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Deferred Red Hat: fix deferred

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Total

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
MLflowMLflow3.14.0—No fix listedCNA
  • MLflow VendorMLflow Affected 3.14.0 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA

CPE names Threatist (inferred) · 1

Inferred from how NVD named this product before; not given by a source.

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:lfprojects:mlflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*——MLflow
  • cpe:2.3:a:lfprojects:mlflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* Versions — — ·MLflow

Remediation

The sources list no fixed version for MLflow. Red Hat rates the issue Moderate and lists Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI) as affected with no fix available.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-04

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Moderate. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

ProductStatusPlan or fix
Red Hat OpenShift AI (RHOAI)AffectedNo fix yet: Fix deferred

Timeline

  1. 2026-11-03 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-118626
  2. 2026-11-04 Affected versions changed · Red Hat
  3. 2026-11-04 CVSS score added · Red Hat
  4. 2026-11-04 Alias added: GHSA-5wwc-v2xc-r6fq
  5. 2026-11-04 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  6. 2026-11-04 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW
  7. 2026-11-05 CISA SSVC decision points changed

References

Other 1

  • TI-2026-46366 Server-side request forgery in mlflow KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.3
  • TI-2023-03518 Absolute Path Traversal in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2023-01113 Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-31759 Redis Lua Use-After-Free may lead to remote code execution CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2026-81527 Code execution via scorer deserialization in MLflow servers CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-14028 Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
See all 175 →

Sources