Read the docs
TI-2026-85669 Aliases CVE-2026-111062

russh SSH server accepts mismatched signature algorithm in publickey auth

Priority MEDIUM 45CWE-347Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
High
Attack requirements
Present
Impact type
Security bypass
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · Low · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-347.

Summary

russh, a Rust SSH client and server library, from version 0.34.0-beta.1 before 0.64.0 has an SSH server that does not check that the signature algorithm in a public-key authentication matches the algorithm named in the request (CWE-347). A client holding an authorized RSA private key can announce rsa-sha2-512 while supplying a valid ssh-rsa SHA-1 signature, which can bypass algorithm restrictions or produce misleading audit records. A valid private-key signature is still required, and russh clients are not affected.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-07

Description from the CNA

russh is a Rust SSH client and server library. From version 0.34.0-beta.1 until version 0.64.0, its SSH server does not require the signature algorithm in a public-key authentication signature to match the algorithm named in the authentication request. A client possessing an authorized RSA private key can announce  rsa-sha2-512  while supplying a valid  ssh-rsa  SHA-1 signature, bypassing restrictions or producing misleading audit records when applications rely on the requested algorithm. A valid private-key signature remains required, and russh clients are not affected. This issue is fixed in version 0.64.0.

Why it matters now

Exploitation Proof of concept CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00354 29th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed russh (Eugeny): 0.64.0russh (crates.io): 0.64.0

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
Poc
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
Eugenyrussh0.34.0-beta.1 to before 0.64.00.64.0Patch availableCNA
—russh (crates.io)0.34.0-beta.1 to before 0.64.00.64.0Patch availableGHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf
  • russh VendorEugeny Affected 0.34.0-beta.1 to before 0.64.0 Fixed in 0.64.0 Patch available CNA
  • russh (crates.io) Vendor— Affected 0.34.0-beta.1 to before 0.64.0 Fixed in 0.64.0 Patch available GHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf

Remediation

Update russh to version 0.64.0, which fixes the issue in both the Eugeny russh and crates.io russh packages.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-07

  • Fix · CNA russh (Eugeny) Fixed in 0.64.0
  • Fix · GHSA-j7h2-66j4-ghjf russh (crates.io) Fixed in 0.64.0 Advisory →

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Low. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

Not affected: 1 product
  • Red Hat Hardened Images

Timeline

  1. 2026-11-05 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-111062
  2. 2026-11-05 CISA SSVC decision points changed
  3. 2026-11-05 Priority changed: LOW → MEDIUM
  4. 2026-11-07 Affected versions changed · Red Hat
  5. 2026-11-07 CVSS score added · Red Hat

References

  • TI-2026-65512 russh: Client-side channel-scoped Handler callbacks fire for channel IDs the client never opened CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-35550 Russh: SSH message fields were decoded through allocation-first parsers before field-specific bounds CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-34331 Russh: Post-decompression SSH packet size was not bounded, allowing remote oversized compressed packets CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-34308 Resource allocation without limits in Eugeny russh CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2025-16084 Tabby has a TCC Bypass via Misconfigured Node Fuses CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.6
  • TI-2024-36991 Tabby has a TCC Bypass via Unnecessary Permissive Entitlements in Tabby CVSS 4.0HIGH 8.6
See all 25 →

Sources