Read the docs
TI-2026-85672 Aliases CVE-2026-111768

Memory exhaustion in Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK

Priority LOW 34CWE-770Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
Denial of service
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
None · None · High
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-770.

Summary

The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK from 1.3.0 before 1.32.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk and from 2.0.0 before 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/server does not limit array elements and object keys validated in HTTP requests (CWE-770). A remote attacker can send one request within the default 4 MiB limit that exhausts memory and terminates the process. No credentials are required unless the application authenticates before SDK processing.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-06

Description from the CNA

The Model Context Protocol TypeScript SDK provides TypeScript client and server implementations of the Model Context Protocol. From 1.3.0 until 1.32.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk and from 2.0.0 until 2.3.0 in @modelcontextprotocol/server, HTTP servers did not enforce a limit on the number of array elements and object keys validated in one request. The affected surface is validation of HTTP requests containing arrays or object keys. The trigger is an array-element or object-key validation workload large enough to exhaust memory while remaining within the request size limit. A single request within the default 4 MiB limit can terminate the process with JavaScript heap exhaustion. No credentials are required unless the application authenticates before SDK processing. Tools accepting arrays or records carry the greatest risk. stdio-only servers do not expose the HTTP request path. Upgrading alone does not enable the new validation bound. Operators must configure both a tool-input element bound and an appropriate request body size limit. This issue is fixed in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.32.0 and @modelcontextprotocol/server 2.3.0.

Why it matters now

EPSS 0.00598 48th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed typescript-sdk (modelcontextprotocol): 1.32.0server (@modelcontextprotocol): 2.3.0+3 more products

SSVC decision points

Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
MLflowtypescript-sdk1.3.0 to before 1.32.01.32.0Patch availableCNA
MLflowserver2.0.0 to before 2.3.02.3.0Patch availableCNA
MLflowsdk1.3.0 to before 1.32.01.32.0Patch availableCNA
—@modelcontextprotocol/sdk (npm)1.3.0 to before 1.32.01.32.0Patch availableGHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453
—@modelcontextprotocol/server (npm)2.0.0 to before 2.3.02.3.0Patch availableGHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453
  • typescript-sdk VendorMLflow Affected 1.3.0 to before 1.32.0 Fixed in 1.32.0 Patch available CNA
  • server VendorMLflow Affected 2.0.0 to before 2.3.0 Fixed in 2.3.0 Patch available CNA
  • sdk VendorMLflow Affected 1.3.0 to before 1.32.0 Fixed in 1.32.0 Patch available CNA
  • @modelcontextprotocol/sdk (npm) Vendor— Affected 1.3.0 to before 1.32.0 Fixed in 1.32.0 Patch available GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453
  • @modelcontextprotocol/server (npm) Vendor— Affected 2.0.0 to before 2.3.0 Fixed in 2.3.0 Patch available GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453

Remediation

Upgrade @modelcontextprotocol/sdk to 1.32.0 or @modelcontextprotocol/server to 2.3.0. Upgrading alone does not enable the new validation bound, so also configure a tool-input element bound and an appropriate request body size limit.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-11-06

  • Fix · CNA typescript-sdk (modelcontextprotocol) Fixed in 1.32.0
  • Fix · CNA server (@modelcontextprotocol) Fixed in 2.3.0
  • Fix · CNA sdk (@modelcontextprotocol) Fixed in 1.32.0
  • Fix · GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 @modelcontextprotocol/sdk (npm) Fixed in 1.32.0 Advisory →
  • Fix · GHSA-46jr-4wx8-v453 @modelcontextprotocol/server (npm) Fixed in 2.3.0 Advisory →

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Important. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

Not affected: 1 product
  • Red Hat Hardened Images

Timeline

  1. 2026-11-05 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-111768
  2. 2026-11-06 Affected versions changed · Red Hat
  3. 2026-11-06 CVSS score added · Red Hat
  4. 2026-11-07 Priority changed: MEDIUM → LOW

References

  • TI-2026-46366 Server-side request forgery in mlflow KEVCVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.3
  • TI-2023-03518 Absolute Path Traversal in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2023-01113 Path Traversal: '\..\filename' in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-31759 Redis Lua Use-After-Free may lead to remote code execution CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
  • TI-2026-81527 Code execution via scorer deserialization in MLflow servers CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2025-14028 Command Injection in mlflow/mlflow CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 10.0
See all 175 →

Sources