THREATIST.IORead the docs 21 records
The security fix for CVE-2025-0728 in eclipse-threadx NetX Duo refactors error handling in the HTTP server PUT process to use a shared cleanup label, but this unified cleanup path unconditionally calls fx_file_close() ev…
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the NetX IPv6 component functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo.
In NetXDuo version before 6.4.4, a networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, in the DHCPV6 client there was an unchecked index extracting the server DUID from the server reply.
In NextX Duo before 6.4.4, in the HTTP client module, the network support code for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, the parsing of HTTP header fields was missing bounds verification.
In NextX Duo's snmp addon versions before 6.4.4, a part of the Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, an attacker could cause an out-of-bound read by a crafted SNMPv3 security parameters.
In NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_icmpv6_validate_options() when handling a packet with ICMP6 options.
In NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() when handling unicast DHCP messages that could cause corr…
In Eclipse Foundation NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ipv4_option_process() when processing an IPv4 packet with th…
In NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ip_packet_receive() function when received an Ethernet with type set as IP but…
In NetX Duo before 6.4.4, the networking support module for Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read issue in _nx_ipv4_packet_receive() function when received an Ethernet frame with less than 4…
In NetX Duo version before 6.4.4, the component of Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was an incorrect bound check in_nx_secure_tls_proc_clienthello_supported_versions_extension() in the extension version field.
In NetX Duo version before 6.4.4, the component of Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was an incorrect bound check resulting it out by two out of bound read.
In NetX Duo version before 6.4.4, the component of Eclipse Foundation ThreadX, there was a potential out of bound read in _nx_secure_tls_process_clienthello() because of a missing validation of PSK length provided in the…
In Eclipse Foundation NextX Duo before 6.4.4, a module of ThreadX, the _nx_secure_tls_process_clienthello() function was missing length verification of certain SSL/TLS client hello message: the ciphersuite length and com…
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets…
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause a denial of service by specially crafted packets.
In NetX Duo component HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.3, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially c…
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets…
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause an integer underflow and a subsequent denial of service by writing a very large file, by specially crafted packets…
In NetX HTTP server functionality of Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before version 6.4.2, an attacker can cause a denial of service by specially crafted packets.
In Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo before 6.4.0, if an attacker can control parameters of __portable_aligned_alloc() could cause an integer wrap-around and an allocation smaller than expected.