Read the docs
TI-2020-04305 Aliases CVE-2020-5249GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58

HTTP Response Splitting (Early Hints) in Puma

Priority LOW 32CWE-113Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
Required
Attack complexity
Low
Impact type
—
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
Low · Low · Low
Fix status
Partial Red Hat: 3 without a fix

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA, GitHub and Red Hat.

Summary

In Puma (RubyGem) before 4.3.3 and 3.12.4, if an application using Puma allows untrusted input in an early-hints header, an attacker can use a carriage return character to end the header and inject malicious content, such as additional headers or an entirely new response body. This vulnerability is known as HTTP Response Splitting. While not an attack in itself, response splitting is a vector for several other attacks, such as cross-site scripting (XSS). This is related to CVE-2020-5247, which fixed this vulnerability but only for regular responses. This has been fixed in 4.3.3 and 3.12.4.

Why it matters now

EPSS 0.01571 75th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Partial Puma (puma): 3.12.4, 4.3.3puma (RubyGems): 3.12.4, 4.3.3Red Hat: 3 without a fix

SSVC decision points

Not available: CISA has not published SSVC decision points for this record.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
pumaPumabefore 3.12.4; 4.0.0 to before 4.3.33.12.4, 4.3.3Patch availableCNA
—puma (RubyGems)before 3.12.43.12.4Patch availableGHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58
—puma (RubyGems)4.0.0 to before 4.3.34.3.3Patch availableGHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58
  • Puma Vendorpuma Affected before 3.12.4; 4.0.0 to before 4.3.3 Fixed in 3.12.4, 4.3.3 Patch available CNA
  • puma (RubyGems) Vendor— Affected before 3.12.4 Fixed in 3.12.4 Patch available GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58
  • puma (RubyGems) Vendor— Affected 4.0.0 to before 4.3.3 Fixed in 4.3.3 Patch available GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58

CPE configurations NVD · 1

CPEVersionsRoleVendor
cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*up to 3.12.3; 4.0.0 – 4.3.2Vulnerablepuma
  • cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:* Versions up to 3.12.3; 4.0.0 – 4.3.2 Vulnerable ·puma

Remediation

  • Fix · CNA Puma (puma) Fixed in 3.12.4, 4.3.3
  • Fix · GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58 puma (RubyGems) Fixed in 3.12.4 Advisory →
  • Fix · GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58 puma (RubyGems) Fixed in 4.3.3 Advisory →

Fixed in the same release

Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.

  • Advisory ·

    Puma — FEDORA-2020-fd87f90634

    2 records Highest priority Priority LOW 2 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

  • Advisory ·

    Puma — FEDORA-2020-08092b4c97

    2 records Highest priority Priority LOW 2 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

Show 1 more group
  • Advisory ·

    Puma — FEDORA-2020-a3f26a9387

    2 records Highest priority Priority LOW 2 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

Vendor assessments

Red Hat

Red Hat rating: Moderate. Red Hat's page for this CVE →

ProductStatusPlan or fix
CloudForms Management Engine 5AffectedNo fix planned: Will not fix
Red Hat Software CollectionsAffectedNo fix planned: Will not fix
Red Hat Storage 3AffectedNo fix planned: Will not fix

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2020-5249
  2. 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-33vf-4xgg-9r58

References

  • TI-2022-08603 HTTP Request Smuggling in puma CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.1
  • TI-2023-21048 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests in puma CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2022-07686 Information Exposure when using Puma with Rails CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.0
  • TI-2020-08950 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2020-08951 HTTP Smuggling via Transfer-Encoding Header in Puma CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2020-04303 HTTP Response Splitting in Puma CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
See all 11 →

Sources