Read the docs
TI-2026-69575 Aliases CVE-2026-107587

Improper certificate validation in hMailServer webmail

Priority LOW 26CWE-295Published · Updated

Key facts

Attack vector
Network
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Attack complexity
High
Impact type
Spoofing
Confidentiality · integrity · availability
High · Low · None
Fix status
Fixed

Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA. Impact type from CWE-295.

Summary

Progressive Robot hMailServer from 6.3.2 before 6.3.6 has improper certificate validation (CWE-295) in its webmail. When a recipient opens a signed message, the webmail keeps the signer's certificate for encrypting replies, whether or not the server trusts its chain, filed under the first address the certificate lists rather than the From address. A remote unauthenticated attacker can have later encrypted mail sent to that address also encrypted to the attacker's key, so a holder of that key who obtains a copy can read it. The user must open a signed message from the attacker.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

Description from the CNA

Improper certificate validation in the webmail of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.2 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have S/MIME-encrypted mail that the account later sends to another correspondent also encrypted to the attacker's key. When its recipient opened a signed message, the webmail kept the signer's certificate for encrypting replies whether or not the server found its chain trusted, under the first e-mail address the certificate listed rather than the message's From address, and beside any certificate already held for that address. Encrypted mail later sent from the webmail to that address was encrypted to every certificate held for it, so a holder of the kept certificate's key who obtains a copy of such a message can read it.

Why it matters now

Exploitation None reported CISA SSVC · not in CISA KEV
EPSS 0.00169 6th percentileScored 2026-11-07
Fix Fixed hMailServer (Progressive Robot Ltd): 6.3.6

SSVC decision points

CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3

Exploitation
None
Automatable
No
Technical impact
Partial

The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.

Affected products

VendorProductAffected versionsFixed inStatusSource
Progressive Robot LtdhMailServer6.3.2 to before 6.3.66.3.6Patch availableCNA
  • hMailServer VendorProgressive Robot Ltd Affected 6.3.2 to before 6.3.6 Fixed in 6.3.6 Patch available CNA

Remediation

Upgrade Progressive Robot hMailServer to version 6.3.6.

Written with Claude Haiku 5.5 from the sources below · 2026-10-29

  • Fix · CNA hMailServer (Progressive Robot Ltd) Fixed in 6.3.6

Fixed in the same release

Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.

  • Release ·

    Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.6

    23 records Highest priority Priority LOW 23 LOW

    Other records, highest priority first

    • TI-2026-69567 Inefficient processing in hMailServer stalls mail deliveryPriority LOW 39
    • TI-2026-69565 Infinite loop in hMailServer MIME handling lets attackers stop mailPriority LOW 39
    • TI-2026-69564 Inefficient DKIM and ARC checks in hMailServer cause denial of servicePriority LOW 39

Timeline

  1. 2026-10-08 Threatist record created from CVE-2026-107587

References

  • TI-2026-64884 Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') in hMailServer CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
  • TI-2026-76418 Unchecked loop limit in hMailServer lets remote attackers stop mail CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-69567 Inefficient processing in hMailServer stalls mail delivery CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-69565 Infinite loop in hMailServer MIME handling lets attackers stop mail CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-69564 Inefficient DKIM and ARC checks in hMailServer cause denial of service CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
  • TI-2026-69562 Inefficient JSON parsing in hMailServer lets attackers halt mail CVSS 3.1HIGH 7.5
See all 41 →

Sources

This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences