Vyper array negative index vulnerability
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Impact type
- Code execution
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · High
- Fix status
- Fixed
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · CNA. Fix status from CNA and GitHub. Impact type from CWE-129 and the CVSS impact.
Summary
Vyper is a Pythonic Smart Contract Language for the Ethereum Virtual Machine. Arrays can be keyed by a signed integer, while they are defined for unsigned integers only. The typechecker doesn't throw when spotting the usage of an `int` as an index for an array. The typechecker allows the usage of signed integers to be used as indexes to arrays. The vulnerability is present in different forms in all versions, including `0.3.10`. For ints, the 2's complement representation is used. Because the array was declared very large, the bounds checking will pass Negative values will simply be represented as very large numbers. As of time of publication, a fixed version does not exist. There are three potential vulnerability classes: unpredictable behavior, accessing inaccessible elements and denial of service. Class 1: If it is possible to index an array with a negative integer without reverting, this is most likely not anticipated by the developer and such accesses can cause unpredictable behavior for the contract. Class 2: If a contract has an invariant in the form `assert index < x`, the developer will suppose that no elements on indexes `y | y >= x` are accessible. However, by using negative indexes, this can be bypassed. Class 3: If the index is dependent on the state of the contract, this poses a risk of denial of service. If the state of the contract can be manipulated in such way that the index will be forced to be negative, the array access can always revert (because most likely the array won't be declared extremely large). However, all these the scenarios are highly unlikely. Most likely behavior is a revert on the bounds check.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- Poc
- Automatable
- No
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vyperlang | vyper | up to 0.3.10 | — | No fix listed | CNA |
| — | vyper (PyPI) | before 0.4.0 | 0.4.0 | Patch available | GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2 |
- vyper Vendorvyperlang Affected up to 0.3.10 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA
- vyper (PyPI) Vendor— Affected before 0.4.0 Fixed in 0.4.0 Patch available GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2
Remediation
- Fix · GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2 vyper (PyPI) Fixed in 0.4.0 Advisory →
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2024-24563
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2
References
Other 4
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/a1fd228cb9936c3e4bbca6f3ee3fb4426ef45490/vyper/codegen/core.py#L534-L541
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper/blob/c150fc49ee9375a930d177044559b83cb95f7963/vyper/semantics/types/subscriptable.py#L127-L137
- https://github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/vyper/PYSEC-2024-150.yaml
- https://github.com/vyperlang/vyper
More vyperlang Vyper vulnerabilities
- TI-2024-16182 Vyper bounds check on built-in `slice()` function can be overflowed CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2024-14992 concat built-in can corrupt memory in vyper CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2022-08657 Integer bounds error in Vyper CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2022-11796 Multiple evaluation of contract address in call in vyper CVSS 3.1HIGH 8.2
- TI-2024-21531 vyper performs double eval of the argument of sqrt CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.3
- TI-2024-21527 vyper performs incorrect topic logging in raw_log CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.3
Sources
- CVE-2024-24563 · CVE Program
- CVE-2024-24563 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-52xq-j7v9-v4v2 · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences