`undici.request` vulnerable to SSRF using absolute URL on `pathname`
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Impact type
- —
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- High · High · High
- Fix status
- Partial Red Hat: 2 without a fix
Attack profile from CVSS 3.1 · NVD. Fix status from CNA, GitHub and Red Hat.
Summary
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js const undici = require("undici") undici.request({origin: "http://example.com", pathname: "//127.0.0.1"}) ``` Instead of processing the request as `http://example.org//127.0.0.1` (or `http://example.org/http://127.0.0.1` when `http://127.0.0.1 is used`), it actually processes the request as `http://127.0.0.1/` and sends it to `http://127.0.0.1`. If a developer passes in user input into `path` parameter of `undici.request`, it can result in an _SSRF_ as they will assume that the hostname cannot change, when in actual fact it can change because the specified path parameter is combined with the base URL. This issue was fixed in `[email protected]`. The best workaround is to validate user input before passing it to the `undici.request` call.
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- Poc
- Automatable
- Yes
- Technical impact
- Partial
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
| Vendor | Product | Affected versions | Fixed in | Status | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NodeJS | undici | up to 5.8.1 | — | No fix listed | CNA |
| — | undici (npm) | before 5.8.2 | 5.8.2 | Patch available | GHSA-8qr4-xgw6-wmr3 |
- undici VendorNodeJS Affected up to 5.8.1 Fixed in — No fix listed CNA
- undici (npm) Vendor— Affected before 5.8.2 Fixed in 5.8.2 Patch available GHSA-8qr4-xgw6-wmr3
Remediation
- Fix · GHSA-8qr4-xgw6-wmr3 undici (npm) Fixed in 5.8.2 Advisory →
Red Hat 1 advisory
- RHSA-2022:7276 Released 2022-11-01 · Red Hat rating ModerateRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management 2.4.8 security fixes and container updates
- Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2.4 for RHEL 8 rhacm2/acm-grafana-rhel8, rhacm2/acm-must-gather-rhel8, rhacm2/acm-operator-bundle +47
Vendor assessments
Red Hat
Red Hat rating: Moderate. Red Hat's page for this CVE →
| Product | Status | Plan or fix |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes 2 | Affected | No fix yet |
| Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces | Affected | No fix yet |
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2022-35949
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-8qr4-xgw6-wmr3
References
Advisory 2
More NodeJS Undici vulnerabilities
- TI-2026-01215 undici is vulnerable to Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') CVSS 3.1CRITICAL 9.8
- TI-2023-09734 CRLF Injection in Nodejs ‘undici’ via host CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.5
- TI-2022-13193 CRLF injection in request headers CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.5
- TI-2022-16375 CRLF Injection in Nodejs ‘undici’ via Content-Type CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 5.3
- TI-2022-13194 Uncleared cookies on cross-host/cross-origin redirect in undici CVSS 3.1MEDIUM 6.5
- TI-2024-20007 Undici's fetch with integrity option is too lax when algorithm is specified but hash value is in incorrect CVSS 3.1LOW 3.5
Sources
- CVE-2022-35949 · CVE Program
- CVE-2022-35949 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-8qr4-xgw6-wmr3 · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
- CVE-2022-35949 · Red Hat security data · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences