Buffer overflow vulnerabilities in CGI scripts lead to segfault
Key facts
- Attack vector
- Network
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Attack complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Impact type
- —
- Confidentiality · integrity · availability
- None · None · Low
- Fix status
- Fixed
Attack profile from CVSS 4.0 · CNA. Fix status from CNA.
Summary
There are many buffer overflow vulnerabilities present in several CGI binaries of the charging station.This issue affects Iocharger firmware for AC model chargers beforeversion 24120701. Likelihood: High – Given the prevalence of these buffer overflows, and the clear error message of the web server, an attacker is very likely to be able to find these vulnerabilities. Impact: Low – Usually, overflowing one of these buffers just causes a segmentation fault of the CGI binary, which causes the web server to return a 502 Bad Gateway error. However the webserver itself is not affected, and no DoS can be achieved. Abusing these buffer overflows in a meaningful way requires highly technical knowledge, especially since ASLR also seems to be enabled on the charging station. However, a skilled attacker might be able to use one of these buffer overflows to obtain remote code execution. CVSS clarification. The attack can be executed over any network connection the station is listening to and serves the web interface (AV:N), and there are no additional security measure sin place that need to be circumvented (AC:L), the attack does not rely on preconditions (AT:N). The attack does require authentication, but the level of authentication is irrelevant (PR:L), it does not require user interaction (UI:N). The attack has a small impact on the availability of the device (VC:N/VI:N/VA:L). There is no impact on subsequent systems. (SC:N/SI:N/SA:N). While this device is an EV charger handing significant amounts of power, we do not expect this vulnerability to have a safety impact. The attack can be automated (AU:Y).
Why it matters now
SSVC decision points
CISA ADP · SSVC 2.0.3
- Exploitation
- None
- Automatable
- Yes
- Technical impact
- Total
The decision (Track, Attend, Act) also depends on your mission and well-being impact; see CISA's SSVC guide.
Affected products
Remediation
- Fix · CNA Iocharger firmware for AC models (Iocharger) Fixed in 24120701
Fixed in the same release
Records fixed by the same vendor advisory or release, as the CNA lists them.
- Release ·
Iocharger firmware for AC models 24120701
11 records Highest priority Priority MEDIUM 8 MEDIUM, 3 LOW
Other records, highest priority first
- TI-2024-29275 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC modelsPriority MEDIUM 46
- TI-2024-29273 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC modelsPriority MEDIUM 46
- TI-2024-29271 Authenticated command injection via <redacted>.exe <redacted> parameterPriority MEDIUM 46
Timeline
- 2026-10-02 Threatist record created from CVE-2024-43663
- 2026-10-03 Alias added: GHSA-g42r-fh8w-cm5m
References
More Iocharger vulnerabilities
- TI-2024-29276 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC models CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
- TI-2024-29275 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC models CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
- TI-2024-29274 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC chargers CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
- TI-2024-29273 OS command injection in Iocharger firmware for AC models CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
- TI-2024-29271 Authenticated command injection via <redacted>.exe <redacted> parameter CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
- TI-2024-29270 Authenticated command injection via <redacted>.exe <redacted> parameter CVSS 4.0CRITICAL 9.3
Sources
- CVE-2024-43663 · CVE Program
- CVE-2024-43663 · NVD
- FIRST EPSS
- GHSA-g42r-fh8w-cm5m · GitHub Advisory Database · CC BY 4.0
This product uses the NVD API but is not endorsed or certified by the NVD. Sources and licences